TechnoServe’s director of impact answers donors' most common questions about nonprofit impact measurement: how we calculate the return on every dollar invested, who verifies the numbers, and whether gains last after a project ends.

When you decide where to invest your charitable dollars at the end of the year, one question matters above all: what tangible difference will your gift make? At TechnoServe, we care deeply about lasting impact. We work hard to create meaningful, measurable improvements in our clients’ lives that persist long after our work with them ends.

As Giving Tuesday approaches, we sat down with TechnoServe’s Director of Impact James Tinker to talk about how we evaluate our work, bring analytical rigor to complex challenges like climate resilience, and ensure your support delivers lasting change.

James Tinker leads the monitoring, evaluation, and learning functions across TechnoServe’s global portfolio. With a career dedicated to using metrics for strategic impact in international development, he oversees technology development, global KPIs, research partnerships, and operational support. He holds a Master of Development Practice from the University of California, Berkeley.

What Does Impact Mean at TechnoServe, and Why Measure It?

  1. What is TechnoServe’s philosophy on impact, and why does impact measurement matter?

Our mission is to build regenerative farms, businesses, and markets that increase incomes. Without rigorous measurement, we can’t know whether we’re truly achieving that mission. My team measures all progress as rigorously as practical and as frequently as possible.

Whenever feasible, we partner with independent external evaluators and academic research institutions to validate results. We don’t treat data collection as a retrospective check or a marketing exercise; we integrate it directly into day-to-day project management. Field teams use ongoing data to identify what is working, course-correct in real time, and maximize the efficiency and effectiveness of program delivery.

To Solve a Big Problem Like Poverty, Think Small…

Read our “Think Small” report to learn how smallholder farmers around the world are transforming their lives and livelihoods.

How Does TechnoServe Calculate Its Return on Investment?

  1. TechnoServe frequently highlights that every donor dollar generates multiple dollars in increased income for the people it serves. How does TechnoServe actually calculate that return, and how do you verify the numbers are accurate?

We calculate return on investment (ROI) by taking the total increase in earned revenue achieved by program participants (and verified indirect beneficiaries) and dividing it by TechnoServe’s total expenditure on that project, which is the full cost required to run the project. In 2025, TechnoServe clients gained an average of $5.70 in additional revenue for every $1 spent on our programs. 

Typically, the ROI captures revenue gains over the active life of the project plus three years post-project, reflecting the realistic sustainability of adopted practices. If the evidence for sustainability in a particular project is not strong enough, we exclude those three post-project years. 

To ensure these figures are credible and verifiable, TechnoServe relies on several layers of data quality control. Our central impact team reviews every project annually and examines calculations down to the raw data. We manage most of our projects globally in a central system that makes all field activities, including data collection, verifiable. At project closeout, field teams review revenue data directly with farmers or entrepreneurs. Participants review their baseline and endline records, correct discrepancies, and formally sign off, confirming the recorded financial gains are real and accurately reflect their experience.

Two women standing in a coffee field in San Martin, Peru.
Coffee farmer Layit Vargas Tello (left) with TechnoServe farmer trainer Kelin Rivarola (right) on a farm in San Martín, Peru. (TechnoServe / Edson Arratea)

Who Checks the Numbers? Attribution and Independent Program Evaluation

  1. When your deliverable isn’t a tangible asset like a tractor or livestock, but rather business training or agronomic advice, proving impact can be harder. How do you isolate TechnoServe’s contribution from outside factors? 

Isolating TechnoServe’s impact starts with testing each project’s theory of change and linking observable improvements directly to financial gains, rather than attributing broad market changes to program activities. A theory of change explains how a given intervention, or set of interventions, is expected to lead to a specific outcome. 

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with external control groups are considered the academic gold standard, they are costly, take years to produce findings, and often deliver high-level information without operational context. We do RCTs periodically, but being a data-driven organization means that we need more frequent insight into what’s working. 

Our project teams isolate impact using tailored methodologies. For example:

  • Practice adoption in agriculture: Rather than assuming good weather or commodity market swings explain a larger harvest, teams measure the exact adoption rates of promoted agronomic practices, such as targeted pruning or composting. By conducting controlled yield tests on demo plots under the same local conditions, TechnoServe measures how much yield variation is directly driven by the new practices.
  • Contribution analysis in business advisory: For small- and medium-sized enterprises receiving business acceleration or managerial training, TechnoServe conducts structured contribution analyses. Entrepreneurs systematically self-assess the specific operational changes they adopted (e.g., inventory management systems, bookkeeping, or new marketing channels) and evaluate what proportion of their revenue growth those interventions directly generated versus external market dynamics.

As part of the REWARDS Program, Josephine Mutindi Kitua (center) meets with TechnoServe business counselor Evalyne Kabui (left) and business advisor Agnes Njagi (right) in her salon at Jericho Market in Nairobi. (TechnoServe / Oliver Madara)
As part of the REWARDS Program, Josephine Mutindi Kitua (center) meets with TechnoServe business counselor Evalyne Kabui (left) and business advisor Agnes Njagi (right) in her salon at Jericho Market in Nairobi. (TechnoServe / Oliver Madara)

Measuring Impact Beyond Revenue: Climate Resilience and Women’s Economic Empowerment

  1. TechnoServe built its reputation on hard financial metrics and verifiable return on investment. How do you bring that same analytical rigor to goals that are notoriously harder to quantify, like climate resilience or women’s economic empowerment?

Rather than developing speculative or proprietary internal metrics, TechnoServe anchors its evaluations to internationally vetted, research-backed industry standards.

For environmental interventions, TechnoServe relies primarily on the Cool Farm Tool, developed by the Cool Farm Alliance. This protocol conducts a comprehensive audit of farm-level practices and input usage (such as fertilizer application, crop residue management, and energy use). The platform pairs these granular farm inputs with research-calibrated emission and carbon sequestration factors to produce credible, scientifically defensible estimates of avoided or sequestered greenhouse gas emissions.

For women’s economic empowerment, TechnoServe uses specialized frameworks such as the Project-Level Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index for deep-dive diagnostics. However, at the most basic level, we ensure all projects track women’s empowerment by: 

  • disaggregating all attendance, training completion, and performance data by gender, and 
  • embedding core diagnostic questions into baseline and endline surveys regarding household decision-making to actively monitor changes in agency. 

Does the Impact Last? Checking Back Years After a Project Ends

  1. A common donor concern is that once an organization finishes a project, things slide back to the status quo. Does TechnoServe track whether benefits to our clients persist two, three, or five years after TechnoServe departs? If so, how? 

Sustained, multi-year impact tracking is one of the most persistent challenges across international development. Once a grant ends, operational teams disperse, respondents become difficult to reach, and institutional donors rarely fund post-project research. We address this sector-wide blind spot through proactive post-project (ex-post) tracking:

  • Leadership in ex-post evaluations: TechnoServe’s leadership actively champions the necessity of long-term tracking, raising dedicated public and private funding to return to communities years after project closure. Recently, we partnered with the independent measurement firm 60 Decibels to publish a landmark ex-post evaluation of two entrepreneurship accelerators, directly verifying business survival rates, sustained revenues, and job creation years after advisory support ended. 
  • Staggered cohort tracking in multi-year programs: In multi-year initiatives with rolling annual cohorts, TechnoServe builds long-term verification directly into the final project evaluation. When conducting the endline evaluation for a program’s final cohort, teams return to survey the first- and second-year cohorts, who have already been operating independently for two to four years. This provides an empirical assessment of whether income gains, regenerative practices, or operational improvements remain self-sustaining.

Nirmala Dhananjay prepares organic biofertilizers in Karnataka, India (TechnoServe / Amrit Vatsa)

The Future of Nonprofit Impact Measurement

  1. Looking ahead, how do you see the future of impact measurement evolving, and how will emerging tools change how TechnoServe proves its impact?

We see three key shifts shaping the future of impact measurement:

  • Cost-efficient, scalable infrastructure: Machine learning and automated data workflows allow teams to build and deploy sophisticated impact-monitoring platforms at a fraction of their historical cost, making continuous, high-rigor data collection possible across more programs.
  • Turning extractive data into actionable advisory: Measurement is moving away from purely extractive surveys—where data was gathered solely for donor reports—toward closed-loop systems. Farmers and small business owners are given direct digital visibility into their own performance metrics, enabling them to benchmark their growth and make smarter business decisions.
  • Integrated AI advisory: Field data is increasingly integrated with automated, AI-driven advisory tools that provide hyper-personalized farming recommendations and business guidance to participants in real time.

By tracking real-time results rather than relying solely on retrospective reports, TechnoServe ensures your donations fund measurable, long-term growth. This Giving Tuesday, your support provides dependable, compounding returns for farmers and entrepreneurs building resilient futures.

Olivia Sakai

Olivia Sakai

Olivia Sakai is a senior communications specialist at TechnoServe. Her background is in multimedia storytelling, digital communications, and sustainable development. She holds a master's degree in development practice from the University of California, Berkeley, and a bachelor's degree in anthropology and geography from California Polytechnic State University-San Luis Obispo. In her free time, Olivia enjoys exploring new places with a camera in hand or taking in the many sights of her hometown, Washington, D.C.

N/A